From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 16 10:43:50 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECF7F16A52F for ; Thu, 16 Mar 2006 10:43:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joao@matik.com.br) Received: from msrv.matik.com.br (msrv.matik.com.br [200.152.83.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4817B43D48 for ; Thu, 16 Mar 2006 10:43:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joao@matik.com.br) Received: from anb (anb.matik.com.br [200.152.83.34]) by msrv.matik.com.br (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k2GAhlGF017181; Thu, 16 Mar 2006 07:43:48 -0300 (BRT) (envelope-from joao@matik.com.br) From: JoaoBR To: Mike Jakubik Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 07:43:27 -0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <200603140740.38388.joao@matik.com.br> <20060315211307.GA88339@xor.obsecurity.org> <44188D9D.8010801@rogers.com> In-Reply-To: <44188D9D.8010801@rogers.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200603160743.27519.joao@matik.com.br> X-Filter-Version: 1.11a (msrv.matik.com.br) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88, clamav-milter version 0.87 on msrv.matik.com.br X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: amd64 slower than i386 on identical AMD 64 system? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 10:43:51 -0000 On Wednesday 15 March 2006 18:56, Mike Jakubik wrote: > Kris Kennaway wrote: > > No, you haven't ruled it out, only that none of the versions you tried > > fix your issue. Note what I said earlier: other people use dual core > > CPUs on FreeBSD/amd64 without stability problems, so it is not a > > general problem with FreeBSD. > > Indeed, they are. The system below is working just fine for me, and the > performance is quite good too (for a pentium4). It's a Supermicro PDSMi > board: > > 6.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.1-PRERELEASE #0: Tue Mar 7 12:24:51 EST > 2006 amd64 > > CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) D CPU 2.80GHz (2793.02-MHz K8-class CPU) > Origin =3D "GenuineIntel" Id =3D 0xf62 Stepping =3D 2 > > Features=3D0xbfebfbffA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE> > Features2=3D0xe43d,> AMD > Features=3D0x20100800 > Hyperthreading: 2 logical CPUs > real memory =3D 535691264 (510 MB) > avail memory =3D 510017536 (486 MB) > FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs > > > I never had any kind of problem with any system with <=3D 2Gb of Ram Jo=E3o A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura. Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik https://datacenter.matik.com.br