From owner-freebsd-net Tue Nov 30 16:37:52 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from bubba.whistle.com (bubba.whistle.com [207.76.205.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C64014D70 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 1999 16:37:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from archie@whistle.com) Received: (from archie@localhost) by bubba.whistle.com (8.9.2/8.9.2) id QAA34742; Tue, 30 Nov 1999 16:37:40 -0800 (PST) From: Archie Cobbs Message-Id: <199912010037.QAA34742@bubba.whistle.com> Subject: Re: netgraph'd enet nics anyone? In-Reply-To: from Vern Nichols at "Nov 23, 1999 10:09:12 am" To: nichols@roundview.com (Vern Nichols) Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 16:37:40 -0800 (PST) Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Vern Nichols writes: > I'm currenlty working on 3.2 with the netgraph 3.0 patches applied. I > see netgraph appears to be integrated into 4.0. Is it worth moving up > to 4.0 before I start getting too deep in netgraph? I would move up to 4.0 if possible because of the delay in MFC'ing changes and updates. -Archie ___________________________________________________________________________ Archie Cobbs * Whistle Communications, Inc. * http://www.whistle.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message