From owner-freebsd-stable  Tue Sep  7  6:18:28 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from noop.colo.erols.net (noop.colo.erols.net [207.96.1.150])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B79614F0B
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Tue,  7 Sep 1999 06:18:27 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from gjp@noop.colo.erols.net)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=noop.colo.erols.net)
	by noop.colo.erols.net with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #1)
	id 11OL8r-000Anv-00; Tue, 7 Sep 1999 09:18:33 -0400
To: Brad Knowles <blk@skynet.be>
Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
From: "Gary Palmer" <gjp@in-addr.com>
Subject: Re: softupdates in latest build? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 07 Sep 1999 09:41:37 +0200."
             <v04205501b3fa71304ab7@[195.238.1.121]> 
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 1999 09:18:18 -0400
Message-ID: <41534.936710298@noop.colo.erols.net>
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Brad Knowles wrote in message ID
<v04205501b3fa71304ab7@[195.238.1.121]>:
> 	Someone else was kind enough to explain to me why bpf is needed 
> -- DHCP depends on it.  While I find this a very regrettable 
> situation, and I would encourage work to try to help ensure that this 
> is not the case for long

Patches are welcomed


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message