Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2000 10:05:23 +0100 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net> Cc: A G F Keahan <ak@freenet.co.uk>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Optimal UFS parameters Message-ID: <59715.976179923@critter> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 07 Dec 2000 00:56:10 PST." <20001207005610.M16205@fw.wintelcom.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20001207005610.M16205@fw.wintelcom.net>, Alfred Perlstein writes: >> So far I don't see any indication here (or elsewhere) that anybody >> has that grasp. >> >> I guess that is really a testimony to FFS/UFS's qualites... >> >> The main thing is that you significantly reduce your fsck time if >> you reduce the number of inodes. > >Oh, your tunables just reduce the number of inodes? That may come >as a suprise to people that are using the larger disks to store >images and web/ftp stuff. No they don't, I mainly reduce the number of cylinder-groups. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?59715.976179923>