Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 17 Sep 2012 11:44:44 +0200
From:      Grzegorz Bernacki <gber@freebsd.org>
To:        Aleksandr Rybalko <ray@freebsd.org>
Cc:        svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r240484 - head/sys/dev/fdt
Message-ID:  <5056F10C.9000602@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <20120916022702.055cb08b.ray@freebsd.org>
References:  <201209140933.q8E9XZnd088621@svn.freebsd.org>	<20120914171652.780e25c6.ray@freebsd.org>	<50535E29.2030102@freebsd.org> <20120916022702.055cb08b.ray@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 09/16/12 01:27, Aleksandr Rybalko wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Sep 2012 18:41:13 +0200
> Grzegorz Bernacki<gber@freebsd.org>  wrote:
>
>> On 09/14/12 16:16, Aleksandr Rybalko wrote:
>>> On Fri, 14 Sep 2012 09:33:35 +0000 (UTC)
>>> Grzegorz Bernacki<gber@FreeBSD.org>   wrote:
>>>
>>>> Author: gber
>>>> Date: Fri Sep 14 09:33:35 2012
>>>> New Revision: 240484
>>>> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/240484
>>>>
>>>> Log:
>>>>     Set busaddr and bussize to 0 when fdt_get_range() fails.
>>>
>>> Why bussize is 0?
>>
>> I though that setting it to 0 makes sense, since we do not use
>> this variable in this function and setting it to some value could be
>> confused. I could skip setting it, but I also thought it could cause
>> confusion :). If you think that setting it to other value or remove
>> it will be better please let me know and I will change it.
>>
>> thanks
>> grzesiek
>
> Yeah, indeed, false alarm. Sorry for noise.
>
> But it will be very nice to hear developers opinion about ePAPR1.1 row
> (about "range" property):
> "If the property is not present in a bus node, it is assumed that no
> mapping exists between children of the node and the parent address
> space."
>
> Assuming since in most cases root node have no "ranges" property, but
> his child "SOC" have that property with defaults (0x0 x 0xffffffff).
> So nodes which have property "ranges" or not, must be processed same
> way. Right?
>
> WBW

Hi,

I am not quite sure that I understand your question. What nodes are you 
referring to and what to you mean by processing them the same way?

regards,
grzesiek



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5056F10C.9000602>