From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 10:54:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4C5D106564A for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 10:54:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dennylin93@hs.ntnu.edu.tw) Received: from mail.hs.ntnu.edu.tw (mail.hs.ntnu.edu.tw [140.131.149.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9427C8FC0A for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 10:54:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.hs.ntnu.edu.tw (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 6A0024B7824; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 18:54:37 +0800 (CST) Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 18:54:37 +0800 From: Denny Lin To: Johan Hendriks Message-ID: <20100928105437.GI79461@mail.hs.ntnu.edu.tw> References: <6F39BA7E-57DD-4806-9D23-EB8D20B5924F@caiman.ie> <57200BF94E69E54880C9BB1AF714BBCBDD2BC4@w2003s01.double-l.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <57200BF94E69E54880C9BB1AF714BBCBDD2BC4@w2003s01.double-l.local> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: Garrett Heaver , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: dovecot-1.2.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 10:54:40 -0000 Hi, On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 09:52:51AM +0200, Johan Hendriks wrote: > >I was just wondering if there is a port for dovecot 2 in the works > already or if I could be any assistance in getting it up and >running? > > > Check out these URL's > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/150789 > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/150790 > > This is no guaranty that it will work, you could however start testing. I am wondering whether there is an established convention about port names and versions since Dovecot 2.0 is now the newest stable branch. Will mail/dovecot be updated to 2.0 and 1.2 moved to mail/dovecot12 or will a new port be added for 2.0? -- Denny Lin