Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 21:39:39 +0300 From: Dmitry Marakasov <amdmi3@amdmi3.ru> To: Torfinn Ingolfsen <tingox@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: aMule 22.3 porting - some questions Message-ID: <20081230183939.GE81218@hades.panopticon> In-Reply-To: <ef8c8a880812301027l671b84b5j9cdf4733ccbbab57@mail.gmail.com> References: <ef8c8a880812291349g5fd986ebwe970f3ed040ba2fb@mail.gmail.com> <ef8c8a880812291504g1daa00d5o5de7bfd27fa20765@mail.gmail.com> <20081230175527.GC81218@hades.panopticon> <ef8c8a880812301027l671b84b5j9cdf4733ccbbab57@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Torfinn Ingolfsen (tingox@gmail.com) wrote: > It stills says "hunk failed" but now it removes the empty file. > So this is good then? The patch you attached applies without any problems. `patch -E`: -------------------------- |diff -ruN amule2.org/files/patch-amuleDlg.cpp amule2/files/patch-amuleDlg.cpp |--- amule2.org/files/patch-amuleDlg.cpp 2006-01-04 06:59:25.000000000 +0100 |+++ amule2/files/patch-amuleDlg.cpp 1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100 -------------------------- Patching file amule2/files/patch-amuleDlg.cpp using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 0. Removing amule2/files/patch-amuleDlg.cpp (empty after patching). ensure that you're testing it on really original amule2 port (I guess that you're not, considering (offset 1 line) messages in the first chunk). -- Dmitry Marakasov . 55B5 0596 FF1E 8D84 5F56 9510 D35A 80DD F9D2 F77D amdmi3@amdmi3.ru ..: jabber: amdmi3@jabber.ru http://www.amdmi3.ru
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20081230183939.GE81218>