From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Fri Apr 3 08:25:25 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D926C27901F for ; Fri, 3 Apr 2020 08:25:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd-lists@BSDforge.com) Received: from udns.ultimatedns.net (static-24-113-41-81.wavecable.com [24.113.41.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "ultimatedns.net", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48ttKY5Kynz44nf; Fri, 3 Apr 2020 08:25:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd-lists@BSDforge.com) Received: from udns.ultimatedns.net (localhost [IPv6:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:1]) by udns.ultimatedns.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 0338PCQT002157 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 3 Apr 2020 01:25:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bsd-lists@BSDforge.com) X-Mailer: Cypht MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: freebsd-current In-Reply-To: From: Chris Reply-To: bsd-lists@BSDforge.com To: Ed Maste Subject: Re: Is sc(4) no longer supported in GENERIC? Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2020 01:25:18 -0700 Message-Id: <8ce3e38fbc077efe224ad1454f696551@udns.ultimatedns.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 48ttKY5Kynz44nf X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.81 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.90)[-0.904,0]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.90)[-0.905,0]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11404, ipnet:24.113.0.0/16, country:US]; local_wl_ip(0.00)[24.113.41.81] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2020 08:25:26 -0000 On Thu, 2 Apr 2020 19:31:53 -0400 Ed Maste emaste@freebsd=2Eorg said > On Thu, 2 Apr 2020 at 17:13, Chris wrote: > > > > Ahem=2E=2E=2E I used the wrong syntax=2E > > changing the entry to > > > > kern=2Evty=3Dsc > > > > solved it! :) >=20 > I'm glad it's working for you, but note that sc(4) is deprecated and > has no ongoing effort behind it, so it would be best if we can > identify and resolve the issue you encountered=2E >=20 > The first thing you can try is vt(4) in text mode, by setting > hw=2Evga=2Etextmode=3D1 Attempting your suggestion returned: sysctl: unknown oid 'hw=2Evga=2Etextmode' Thanks for trying! I guess I should look into attempting to put some effort into sc(4) and try to find out why it's being depreciated=2E If it's just lack of commitment to it=2E I'll see if I can't take it on myself=2E :) Thanks again! :) --Chris