From owner-freebsd-net  Sun Feb  4 10:16:15 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from hera.drwilco.net (10dyn100.dh.casema.net [212.64.31.100])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id D379337B69D; Sun,  4 Feb 2001 10:15:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ceres.drwilco.net (ceres.drwilco.net [10.1.1.19])
	by hera.drwilco.net (8.11.2/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f14Icco00219;
	Sun, 4 Feb 2001 19:38:41 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from drwilco@drwilco.net)
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.0.20010204182315.00ce8100@mail.drwilco.net>
X-Sender: drwilco@mail.drwilco.net
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2
Date: Sun, 04 Feb 2001 18:30:36 +0100
To: Rich Wales <richw@webcom.com>
From: "Rogier R. Mulhuijzen" <drwilco@drwilco.net>
Subject: Re: BRIDGE breaks ARP?
Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
In-Reply-To: <20010204161742.04832.richw@wyattearp.stanford.edu>
References: <4.3.2.7.0.20010204160340.00afe240@mail.bsdchicks.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org


>ed0: <NE2000 PCI Ethernet (Compex)> port 0xd400-0xd41f irq 9 at device 9.0 
>on pci0
>ed0: address 00:80:48:c6:1d:ec, type NE2000 (16 bit)
>pcn0: <AMD PCnet/Home HomePNA> port 0xd000-0xd01f mem 
>0xe7000000-0xe700001f irq 9 at device 10.0 on pci0
>pcn0: Ethernet address: 00:20:78:b1:74:4a
>xl0: <3Com 3c900-TPO Etherlink XL> port 0xb800-0xb83f irq 12 at device 
>11.0 on pci0
>xl0: Ethernet address: 00:60:97:05:32:cd
>xl0: selecting 10baseT transceiver, half duplex
>rl0: <Accton MPX 5030/5038 10/100BaseTX> port 0xb400-0xb4ff mem 
>0xe6800000-0xe68000ff irq 11 at device 12.0 on pci0
>rl0: Ethernet address: 00:e0:29:68:64:3e
>BRIDGE 990810, have 5 interfaces
>-- index 1  type 6 phy 0 addrl 6 addr 00.80.48.c6.1d.ec
>-- index 2  type 6 phy 0 addrl 6 addr 00.20.78.b1.74.4a
>-- index 3  type 6 phy 0 addrl 6 addr 00.60.97.05.32.cd
>-- index 4  type 6 phy 0 addrl 6 addr 00.e0.29.68.64.3e
>-- match beg(3) <rl0:1,xl0:1,pcn0:2,ed0:2,> p <1,xl0:1,pcn0:2,ed0:2,>
>--++  found rl0:1
>-- match beg(3) <xl0:1,pcn0:2,ed0:2,> p <1,pcn0:2,ed0:2,>
>--++  found xl0:1
>-- match beg(4) <pcn0:2,ed0:2,> p <2,ed0:2,>
>--++  found pcn0:2
>-- match beg(3) <ed0:2,> p <2,>
>--++  found ed0:2
> >> now ed0 promisc ON if_flags 0xffff8943 bdg_flags 0x5
> >> now pcn0 promisc ON if_flags 0xffff8943 bdg_flags 0x5
> >> now xl0 promisc ON if_flags 0xffff8943 bdg_flags 0x5
> >> now rl0 promisc ON if_flags 0xffff8943 bdg_flags 0x5

Interesting. 4 interfaces in 2 clusters. Do you have the same problem in 
the 2nd cluster?

Do you have the same problem without clustering? I.E. make the bridge do 
all 4 interfaces at once.

What happens when you assign the IP to xl0 instead of rl0?

Just some things you can try that might give us some more info.

         DocWilco



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message