From owner-freebsd-hackers  Fri May  3 11:46:21 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id LAA00281
          for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 3 May 1996 11:46:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.211])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id LAA00276
          for <FreeBSD-hackers@FreeBSD.org>; Fri, 3 May 1996 11:46:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id LAA14600; Fri, 3 May 1996 11:38:32 -0700
From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
Message-Id: <199605031838.LAA14600@phaeton.artisoft.com>
Subject: Re: used to think I understood ps ..
To: wilko@yedi.iaf.nl (Wilko Bulte)
Date: Fri, 3 May 1996 11:38:32 -0700 (MST)
Cc: FreeBSD-hackers@FreeBSD.org
In-Reply-To: <199605022119.XAA03171@yedi.iaf.nl> from "Wilko Bulte" at May 2, 96 11:19:18 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> 1000  3055   298  12 -18  0   140 7588 vnread D+    p2    0:20.99 cmp -l two
> 
> Here RSS >> VSZ apparantly. I was under the impression VSZ <= RSS ??
> 
> FWIW the cmp compares two 120Mb files (raw satellite images)

I would think this would be legal for a program with a shared
libc that hasn't used most of libc yet, but the libc is in core
because other programs have?


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.