From owner-freebsd-current Wed Apr 24 09:46:30 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id JAA00287 for current-outgoing; Wed, 24 Apr 1996 09:46:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from vector.jhs.no_domain (slip139-92-42-189.ut.nl.ibm.net [139.92.42.189]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id JAA00278 Wed, 24 Apr 1996 09:46:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from jhs@localhost) by vector.jhs.no_domain (8.7.3/8.6.9) id TAA24670; Tue, 23 Apr 1996 19:07:57 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Tue, 23 Apr 1996 19:07:57 +0200 (MET DST) Message-Id: <199604231707.TAA24670@vector.jhs.no_domain> To: current@freebsd.org Cc: jkh@freebsd.org Subject: non drive zero installation From: "Julian H. Stacey" Reply-To: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: Vector Systems Ltd. Address: Holz Strasse 27d, 80469 Munich, Germany Phone: +49.89.268616 Fax: +49.89.2608126 (pending modem change) Web: http://www.freebsd.org/~jhs/ Mailer: EXMH [version 1.6.5 95 12 11], PGP available Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk A tentative suggestion: Whoever keeps a list of pre-release tests/objectives might want to add "Capability to install on drive [non zero ie sd2]." (& there again you might not, or it might be listed already, I have no time to check, but I'll forget to mention it if I don't here & now. (PS FWIW DOS-5 doesnt want to install on non sd0 either.) I mention it as I was trying to install 2.0.5 on sd2, & failed. (Tearing box apart, & adding scsi selectors to front of pc-chassis succeeded ). I know 2.1 is current release, but I've reinstalled 2.0.5 on one of my boxes to match a customer environment (my boxes are normally current-ish + 2.1). Julian -- Julian H. Stacey jhs@freebsd.org http://www.freebsd.org/~jhs/ (PGP available)