From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 16 21:08:42 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76C471065670 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2008 21:08:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhein@timing.com) Received: from Daffy.timing.com (mx2.timing.com [206.168.13.218]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D1268FC14 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2008 21:08:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhein@timing.com) Received: from gromit.timing.com (gromit.timing.com [206.168.13.209]) by Daffy.timing.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m8GKn8Ak071146 for ; Tue, 16 Sep 2008 14:49:09 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from jhein@timing.com) Received: from gromit.timing.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gromit.timing.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m8GKHGmU054532; Tue, 16 Sep 2008 14:17:16 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from jhein@gromit.timing.com) Received: (from jhein@localhost) by gromit.timing.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m8GKHG8M054529; Tue, 16 Sep 2008 14:17:16 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from jhein) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <18640.5196.580629.632590@gromit.timing.com> Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2008 14:17:16 -0600 From: John Hein To: arch@freebsd.org X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 22.2.1 X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.91.2, clamav-milter version 0.91.2 on Daffy.timing.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Subject: 64 bit time_t X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2008 21:08:42 -0000 Other than recompiling for -current users (and not being an MFC-able change and possibly breaking a gazillion unfortunately written ports), are their any other issues with switching to 64 bit time_t for i386? I suppose compat libs are a bit dicey.