Date: Tue, 12 Oct 1999 17:06:10 -0500 From: Ade Lovett <ade@lovett.com> To: Mike Meyer <mwm@phone.net> Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/14287: Fix distfile survey for databases/cdb Message-ID: <19991012170610.Y2398@lovett.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9910121359140.35082-100000@guru.phone.net> References: <199910121830.LAA09294@freefall.freebsd.org> <Pine.BSF.4.10.9910121359140.35082-100000@guru.phone.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Oct 12, 1999 at 02:06:52PM -0700, Mike Meyer wrote: > > Note that in HTTP/1.2, "Moved Temporarily" has changed to "Found", > which more correctly describes the use that pobox is making of > it. Unless there's strong evidence that that pobox account is going > away, I'd say they should be left that way. I'm looking at this from the perspective of an overall 'failure' (perhaps too strong a word, RealJob[tm] is interfering :) What we have here is a situation where any one of a number of possible fixes can be applied to correct the situation, namely that the distfile survey is flagging a false-positive failure for this port. The options are as follows: 1. use the pobox.com URLs (in both places), and con^Wcontact Bill to make the appropriate modifications to handle the 302 redirect message 2. use the uic.edu URLs (in both places) I honestly don't mind either way -- the 'problem' gets solved with both approaches. What does bug me (a little bit), is the inconsistent use of pobox.com/uic.edu in the port. Hence the PR. At least now there's a PR that can be tracked until the appropriate solution is implemented, further improving the quality (albeit by a miniscule amount :) of the awesome ports tree and associated management tools. Enjoy, -aDe -- Ade Lovett, Austin, TX. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19991012170610.Y2398>