Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 07 Oct 2000 20:15:28 GMT
From:      Salvo Bartolotta <bartequi@inwind.it>
To:        Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>
Cc:        Philipp Huber <uebs@gmx.at>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: downgrade?
Message-ID:  <20001007.20152800@bartequi.ottodomain.org>
In-Reply-To: <20001007041328.S272@fw.wintelcom.net>
References:  <20001007130438.D244@tori.mini.net> <20001007041328.S272@fw.wintelcom.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

On 10/7/00, 12:13:28 PM, Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net> wrote=20
regarding Re: downgrade?:


> * Philipp Huber <uebs@gmx.at> [001007 04:08] wrote:
> > hi!
> >
> > is it possible to downgrade a freebsd-current installation to -stabl=
e?
> > or is it better to reinstall the whole system?

> It's possible by building a 4.x-stable system and tar'ing the
> /usr/src and /usr/obj over to your -current then doing several
> 'make -k installworld' followed by a 'make installworld' to make
> sure it's all been installed then by building a kernel using the
> "make buildkernel" method described in src/UPDATING.

> --
> -Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org]
> "I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk."



Dear Alfred Perlstein,

<caution type=3D"I haven't (as yet) tried this">=20

From the posts I have been reading, I seem to understand that the=20
following may apply (depending on the divergence/relationship between=20
-CURRENT and -STABLE):

-- It may be necessary to downgrade the toolchain (e.g. binutils;=20
gcc);
-- It may be necessary to downgrade "script"utils (ie perl).

</caution>

Best regards,
Salvo





To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001007.20152800>