From owner-freebsd-current  Fri Nov 22 11:37:32 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id LAA12483
          for current-outgoing; Fri, 22 Nov 1996 11:37:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dyson.iquest.net ([198.70.144.127])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id LAA12452
          for <current@freebsd.org>; Fri, 22 Nov 1996 11:36:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from root@localhost) by dyson.iquest.net (8.8.2/8.6.9) id OAA01716; Fri, 22 Nov 1996 14:35:18 -0500 (EST)
From: "John S. Dyson" <toor@dyson.iquest.net>
Message-Id: <199611221935.OAA01716@dyson.iquest.net>
Subject: Re: SMP?
To: alk@Think.COM (Tony Kimball)
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 1996 14:35:18 -0500 (EST)
Cc: j@uriah.heep.sax.de, current@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <199611221917.NAA05605@compound.Think.COM> from "Tony Kimball" at Nov 22, 96 01:17:50 pm
Reply-To: dyson@freebsd.org
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24 ME8]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> 
> Quoth J. Wunsch on Tue, 19 November:
> : As Ralf Luettgen wrote:
> : 
> : > Wich Release will contain SMP?
> : 
> : 3.0
> : 
> 
> Wow, you guys are really planning ahead.  You got a milestone schedule
> for that one? ;-)
> 
I have been talking to them, and if they want, most of my work for 3.0
can be directed towards things that will enable/help the SMP guys get their
stuff in.  I'll drop any LFS/VFS layer/VM or anything else to help...
Considering the progress that they are making and how important SMP is,
IMO, nothing should be allowed to get in their way...  I think that they
are on a winning track...

John
dyson@freebsd.org