From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org  Wed Jun 19 21:01:00 2019
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53E3815CA0E9;
 Wed, 19 Jun 2019 21:01:00 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from rfg@tristatelogic.com)
Received: from outgoing.tristatelogic.com (segfault.tristatelogic.com
 [69.62.255.118])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64A8782C5E;
 Wed, 19 Jun 2019 21:00:59 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from rfg@tristatelogic.com)
Received: by segfault.tristatelogic.com (Postfix, from userid 1237)
 id E22524E653; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 14:00:52 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg@tristatelogic.com>
To: FreeBSD Net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>,
 Mailinglists FreeBSD <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: Eliminating IPv6 (?)
In-Reply-To: <CAPS9+St4P6bfnS4L5ZpLHZA4K8qjzkLpZFPNwTeumKOyEp1tGw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <31075.1560978052.1@segfault.tristatelogic.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 14:00:52 -0700
Message-ID: <31076.1560978052@segfault.tristatelogic.com>
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 64A8782C5E
X-Spamd-Bar: -----
Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org;
 spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of rfg@tristatelogic.com designates
 69.62.255.118 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=rfg@tristatelogic.com
X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.90 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[];
 NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[];
 R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[];
 MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain];
 DMARC_NA(0.00)[tristatelogic.com];
 NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0];
 IP_SCORE(-2.76)[ip: (-7.24), ipnet: 69.62.128.0/17(-3.62), asn: 14051(-2.86),
 country: US(-0.06)]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[];
 MX_GOOD(-0.01)[mx1.tristatelogic.com]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2];
 NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.93)[-0.935,0]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[];
 FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[];
 MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+];
 ASN(0.00)[asn:14051, ipnet:69.62.128.0/17, country:US];
 RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; SUBJECT_HAS_QUESTION(0.00)[]
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 21:01:00 -0000

In message <CAPS9+St4P6bfnS4L5ZpLHZA4K8qjzkLpZFPNwTeumKOyEp1tGw@mail.gmail=
.com>
Andreas Nilsson <andrnils@gmail.com> wrote:

>> That is *not* what the Handbook says.  Please read it.
>> https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/firewalls-ip=
fw.html
>>
>Ok, so the handbook is wrong. It's a bug in the documentation.

ACK

>As soon as set firewall_script instead of firewall_type your problems wil=
l
>be solved. Just try it. The man page for rc.conf will tell you the same
>thing.

ACK.  Thank you for setting me straight.


Regards,
rfg