Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 2 Oct 2001 12:43:54 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
To:        Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net>
Cc:        Greg Lehey <grog@FreeBSD.org>, Gersh <gersh@sonn.com>, Bernd Walter <ticso@mail.cicely.de>, Anjali Kulkarni <anjali@indranetworks.com>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: setjmp/longjmp
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0110021243350.92100-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
In-Reply-To: <20011002160414.B10919@ringworld.oblivion.bg>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, Peter Pentchev wrote:

> On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 10:56:24AM +0930, Greg Lehey wrote:
> > [Format recovered--see http://www.lemis.com/email/email-format.html]
> > 
> > On Friday, 28 September 2001 at 10:12:14 -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> > > On Fri, 28 Sep 2001, Gersh wrote:
> > >> On Fri, 28 Sep 2001, Bernd Walter wrote:
> > >>> On Fri, Sep 28, 2001 at 07:03:51PM +0530, Anjali Kulkarni wrote:
> > >>>> Does anyone know whether it is advisable or not to use
> > >>>> setjmp/longjmp within kernel code? I could not see any
> > >>>> setjmp/longjmp in kernel source code. Is there a good reason for
> > >>>> this or can it be used?
> > >>>
> > >>> You need to look again, it's used in several places in the kernel.
> > >>
> > >> Look at sys/i386/i386/db_interface.c
> > >
> > > Yeah but it would probably be a pretty bad idea to use it without
> > > very careful thought.  Especialy with the kernel becoming
> > > pre-emptable in the future..
> > 
> > Can you think of a scenario where it wouldn't work?  Preemption
> > doesn't tear stacks apart, right?
> 
> How about a case of a longjmp() back from under an acquired lock/mutex?
> Like function A sets up a jump buffer, calls function B, B acquires
> a lock, B calls C, C longjmp()'s back to A; what happens to the lock?
> 
> It would work if A were aware of B's lock and the possibility of a code
> path that would end up with it still being held; I presume that this is
> what Julian meant by 'very careful thought'.

pretty much...


> 
> G'luck,
> Peter
> 
> -- 
> Do you think anybody has ever had *precisely this thought* before?
> 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0110021243350.92100-100000>