From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Dec 4 10:26:52 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from etinc.com (et-gw.etinc.com [207.252.1.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFA2915118; Sat, 4 Dec 1999 10:26:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dennis@etinc.com) Received: from dbsys (dbsys.etinc.com [207.252.1.18]) by etinc.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id NAA16812; Sat, 4 Dec 1999 13:29:21 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <199912041829.NAA16812@etinc.com> X-Sender: dennis@etinc.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.0 Date: Sat, 04 Dec 1999 13:24:53 -0500 To: Wes Peters From: Dennis Subject: Re: PCI DMA lockups in 3.2 (3.3 maybe?) Cc: Mike Smith , Kris Kennaway , freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <38494F52.3732AFF7@softweyr.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 10:28 AM 12/4/99 -0700, Wes Peters wrote: >Dennis wrote: >> >> There was a time that when someone reported a problem there was interest in >> finding out what it might be. Now you mock the person reporting it. I guess >> thats why everyone in the world is using linux. Its disheartening to >> realize that things apparently wont be getting much better. > >If you're insinuating that Linux is more stable and reliable than FreeBSD, >you're absolutely and unequivocally wrong. All Im saying is that more people use linux because its getting better and they are responsive to their community. Im comparing Freebsd 2.2.8 to 3.3 and citing that there are more problems with 3.3 than 2.2.8 Linux 2.2 was a vast improvement over 2.0 whilst that clearly isnt the case here. > Unless they're running your drivers. I'm perfectly willing to accept YOUR DRIVERS might be less unstable on Linux than FreeBSD. "less unstable". Is that a technical term? If you are going to make totally ignorant statements at least try to get the semantics right. DB Dennis To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message