From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Aug  1 11:47:55 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id LAA00984
          for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 1 Aug 1996 11:47:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from filitov.isf.rl.af.mil (FILITOV.ISF.RL.AF.MIL [128.132.64.25])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id LAA00963;
          Thu, 1 Aug 1996 11:47:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from green@localhost) by filitov.isf.rl.af.mil (8.7.3/8.7.3) id OAA24550; Thu, 1 Aug 1996 14:07:14 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <199608011807.OAA24550@filitov.isf.rl.af.mil>
From: green@filitov.isf.rl.af.mil (Charles Green)
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 1996 14:07:13 +1000
In-Reply-To: J Wunsch <j@uriah.heep.sax.de>
       "Re: FreeBSD and Mach 64" (Aug  1, 19:41)
X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.4 2/2/92)
To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch)
Subject: Re: FreeBSD and Mach 64
Cc: hackers@freebsd.org, questions@freebsd.org
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

	You know, I did check the FAQ. I read 7.12 and saw that it was a
recognized problem. What I didn't do was notice that 7.13 showed a 
fix. Oops :)

	I think 7.12 and 7.13 should be made into one entry, all the
other questions have the solution included with the explaination of
the problem.

J Wunsch stands accused of saying:
} Date: Aug  1, 19:41
} Subject: Re: FreeBSD and Mach 64
} As Charles Kenneth Green - PRC wrote:
} 
} >         Has there been a fix for the sio.c bug that fouls up Mach 64
} > cards.  I have a FreeBSD 2.1 system that I had to replace the video
} > card in. The card I ended up getting uses a Mach 64 chip and I'd
} > prefer not to have to send it back.
} 
} RTFAQ please.
} 
} -- 
} cheers, J"org
} 
} joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE
} Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
}-- End of excerpt from J Wunsch



-- 
Charles Green, PRC, Inc.
Rome Laboratory, NY