From owner-cvs-all Tue May 8 10:25:50 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [18.24.4.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2C4637B424; Tue, 8 May 2001 10:25:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu) Received: (from wollman@localhost) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id NAA63422; Tue, 8 May 2001 13:25:44 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wollman) Date: Tue, 8 May 2001 13:25:44 -0400 (EDT) From: Garrett Wollman Message-Id: <200105081725.NAA63422@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: Poul-Henning Kamp Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/ufs/ffs fs.h softdep.h ffs_softdep.c ffs_softdep_stub.c ffs_inode.c ffs_vfsops.c src/sys/ufs/ufs ufs_extern.h inode.h ufs_inode.c In-Reply-To: <57515.989309002@critter> References: <200105080742.f487gKX83668@freefall.freebsd.org> <57515.989309002@critter> Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG < said: > Why not simply notice that free space will become available (by > examining the counters, and sleep on something (lbolt ?) until > either it does or it conclusively doesn't become available ? My recollection of what Kirk told me when we discussed this at LISA was that in some circumstances the allocation can take place with locks held, resulting ultimately in deadlock. -GAWollman To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message