Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 21 Apr 2015 00:25:29 +0300
From:      Sergey Kandaurov <pluknet@gmail.com>
To:        Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>
Cc:        arch@freebsd.org, amd64@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Move x86 idle code to the x86/ common place.
Message-ID:  <CAE-mSO%2BgEFFRio4P3157NcSoNOpf9JifH98WqKgi9TmBu6hgvw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20150420162149.GE2390@kib.kiev.ua>
References:  <20150420162149.GE2390@kib.kiev.ua>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 20 April 2015 at 19:21, Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> wrote:
[..]
> +struct {
> +       void    *id_fn;
> +       char    *id_name;
> +} idle_tbl[] = {
> +       { cpu_idle_spin, "spin" },
> +       { cpu_idle_mwait, "mwait" },
> +       { cpu_idle_hlt, "hlt" },
> +#if !defined(__i386__) || !defined(PC98)
> +       { cpu_idle_acpi, "acpi" },
> +#endif
> +       { NULL, NULL }
> +};
> +

I believe this conditional could be left unchanged as #ifndef PC98
(also in several other places), given that pc98 may not be present
other than under i386.  Otherwise, looks good.

-- 
wbr,
pluknet



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAE-mSO%2BgEFFRio4P3157NcSoNOpf9JifH98WqKgi9TmBu6hgvw>