From owner-freebsd-arch Tue Oct 31 11:31:13 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from pike.osd.bsdi.com (pike.osd.bsdi.com [204.216.28.222]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD6E137B479 for ; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 11:31:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from laptop.baldwin.cx (john@dhcp241.osd.bsdi.com [204.216.28.241]) by pike.osd.bsdi.com (8.11.0/8.9.3) with ESMTP id e9VJUMf15024; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 11:30:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.4.0 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <200010311747.KAA80353@harmony.village.org> Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 11:31:23 -0800 (PST) From: John Baldwin To: Warner Losh Subject: RE: Like to commit my diskprep Cc: arch@FreeBSD.org Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 31-Oct-00 Warner Losh wrote: > Before anyone asks, the biggest difference between my diskprep and > Matt's recent changes are that diskprep doesn't introduce a new api > into the kernel and doesn't pollute disklabel with functions it > traditionally hasn't done. Matt's changes put functionality into > edisklabel and the kernel. Actually, I would think that creating a virgin disklabel would be part of disklabel's job. After all, doesn't it make sense to use the disklabel program to create/edit disklabel's? > Warner -- John Baldwin -- http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ PGP Key: http://www.baldwin.cx/~john/pgpkey.asc "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message