From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 29 17:20:34 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 252DF106566B for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 17:20:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (lurza.secnetix.de [IPv6:2a01:170:102f::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95D7A8FC0C for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 17:20:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o9THKFSm074192; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 19:20:31 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from oliver.fromme@secnetix.de) Received: (from olli@localhost) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o9THKFfF074191; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 19:20:15 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from olli) Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 19:20:15 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <201010291720.o9THKFfF074191@lurza.secnetix.de> From: Oliver Fromme To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG, hawei@free.fr In-Reply-To: X-Newsgroups: list.freebsd-emulation User-Agent: tin/1.8.3-20070201 ("Scotasay") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/6.4-PRERELEASE-20080904 (i386)) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.3.5 (lurza.secnetix.de [127.0.0.1]); Fri, 29 Oct 2010 19:20:31 +0200 (CEST) Cc: Subject: Re: linux_base-f10 [Was: Re: VirtualBox OpenSolaris guest becomes: ?portmaster] X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 17:20:34 -0000 Harald Weis wrote: > I cannot find out why the linux_base-f10 files are not installed in the > linuxbase (/compat/linux). > [...] > me@pollux:/<3>linux_base-f10 # make -V LINUXBASE > /compat/linux Very strange. If the install of the port finished without error, then it must have installed the files _somewhere_. Or they got removed again immediately after installation (the mtime on the /compat/linux directory should reveal that). What's the output of the following command? $ pkg_info -p linux_base-f10-10_3 Also, this command should list all files belonging to the port with full paths: $ pkg_info -L linux_base-f10-10_3 > For the next (fourth) experiment I would like to run > "make install WITH_DEBUG=yes" . > > Is that okay or is there a better way? Something worth to try: # MAKEFLAGS="-d l" make install (That's a lower-case letter "L", not the digit one.) It will make the installation more verbose so you can see all the actual commands that are executed. Best regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing b. M. Handelsregister: Registergericht Muenchen, HRA 74606, Geschäftsfuehrung: secnetix Verwaltungsgesellsch. mbH, Handelsregister: Registergericht Mün- chen, HRB 125758, Geschäftsführer: Maik Bachmann, Olaf Erb, Ralf Gebhart FreeBSD-Dienstleistungen, -Produkte und mehr: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd Perl is worse than Python because people wanted it worse. -- Larry Wall