Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2017 07:45:12 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> To: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r456402 - in head/lang/ocaml: . files Message-ID: <20171216074512.GB4791@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20171215191612.GA13818@lonesome.com> References: <201712151531.vBFFV86t045131@repo.freebsd.org> <20171215170122.GA55820@FreeBSD.org> <20171215191612.GA13818@lonesome.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 01:16:12PM -0600, Mark Linimon wrote: > On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 05:01:22PM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > I don't know why as(1), as /usr/bin/as typically, is not installed on > > ref11-aarch64.freebsd.org. > > Perhaps the Makefile patch from the following will be instructive: > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221901 Yes, that's what first comes to mind, but I want to understand first why there is not as(1) on some targets in the first placed, while it is installed on clangish i386/amd64. > which were patches from strejda which the maintainer never responded > to IIUC. > > It appears that the proposed arch changes to the patch-configure file > in that PR are OBE*, but I don't think that the other lines are. patch-configure is incorrectly generated in that PR, please don't commit it. Let's see if I can sort out arm* building problems in next couple of days first. ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20171216074512.GB4791>