From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 15 02:08:00 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EC5716A401 for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2007 02:08:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mail@ozzmosis.com) Received: from smtp.mel.people.net.au (smtp.mel.people.net.au [218.214.17.98]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AB64813C45E for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2007 02:07:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mail@ozzmosis.com) Received: (qmail 3574 invoked from network); 15 Mar 2007 01:41:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO blizzard.dnsalias.org) (218.215.142.46) by smtp.mel.people.net.au with SMTP; 15 Mar 2007 01:41:18 -0000 Received: by blizzard.dnsalias.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 63B5A232; Thu, 15 Mar 2007 12:41:16 +1100 (EST) Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 12:41:16 +1100 From: andrew clarke To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070315014116.GA3688@ozzmosis.com> References: <9481052.post@talk.nabble.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Subject: Re: php4 port - undefined ref to getopt_long X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 02:08:00 -0000 On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 12:37:48PM -0700, Chuck Swiger wrote: > Please be aware that FreeBSD 4.11 is no longer supported-- the ports > framework has been updated in a fashion which is no longer backwards > compatible with that version of the OS, so you're going to be rolling > your own software from here on out if you want to stay with that > version. I have a FreeBSD 4.10-REL system here with a still-working ports system, using the latest ports tree. Judging from your comment above, this is impossible, unless I've misunderstood you. Should ports maintainers still be encouraged to support 4.x if it is not a lot of trouble? Recently I've sent mail to two port maintainers with very minor patches to build ports on 4.x. (I do intend to upgrade to 6.x at some stage, but not until a lot of ports that I use start to fail to build, and there is no sign of that happening yet :-) Regards Andrew