From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 2 10:21:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 784181065698 for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 10:21:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from smtp.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 387958FC0C for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 10:21:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ds4.des.no (des.no [84.49.246.2]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEE1B1FFC33; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 10:21:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ds4.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 781518454C; Thu, 2 Sep 2010 12:21:07 +0200 (CEST) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: Xin LI References: <86bp8h5mn6.fsf@ds4.des.no> <86d3swmpjz.fsf@ds4.des.no> Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 12:21:07 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Xin LI's message of "Thu, 2 Sep 2010 03:14:47 -0700") Message-ID: <86vd6ola3w.fsf@ds4.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /stand/camcontrol X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 10:21:10 -0000 Xin LI writes: > Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav writes: > > Xin LI writes: > > > My 2 cents: I think we don't really need to care about the size > > > for rescue binary after the splitfs VFS layer have been introduced > > > to libstand? Build of release split MFSROOT was 2006-ish and I > > > feel that this can be gone. > > This is /stand, not /rescue; /rescue has a full camcontrol. > Oh you are right. But MFSROOT have /stand (for sysinstall), not > /rescue, I think? Correct. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no