From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Apr 11 13:50:42 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from eastwood.aldigital.algroup.co.uk (eastwood.aldigital.algroup.co.uk [194.128.162.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 948DD37BADA; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 13:50:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ben@algroup.co.uk) Received: from freeby.ben.algroup.co.uk (freeby.ben.algroup.co.uk [193.133.15.6]) by eastwood.aldigital.algroup.co.uk (8.8.8/8.6.12) with ESMTP id UAA08999; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 20:50:23 GMT Received: from algroup.co.uk (naughty.ben.algroup.co.uk [193.133.15.107]) by freeby.ben.algroup.co.uk (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id VAA09478; Tue, 11 Apr 2000 21:50:15 +0100 Message-ID: <38F38FEF.FD0D28DA@algroup.co.uk> Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 21:49:51 +0100 From: Ben Laurie Organization: A.L. Group plc X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (WinNT; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dirk Froemberg Cc: Adam Laurie , "David O'Brien" , greg@greg.rim.or.jp, sumikawa@FreeBSD.org, hetzels@westbend.net, rse@engelschall.com, ache@FreeBSD.org, winter@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org, asami@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: apache13-php4 References: <20000327155812.C23367@jade.chc-chimes.com> <20000330172419.B59713@dragon.nuxi.com> <20000330203838.H23367@jade.chc-chimes.com> <20000330210930.A60684@dragon.nuxi.com> <4.3.2.20000330233528.00df0520@207.227.119.2> <20000406130132.B70225@dragon.nuxi.com> <20000409011437.C50277@physik.TU-Berlin.DE> <38F237BB.5D5FAC4C@algroup.co.uk> <20000411212712.A70090@physik.TU-Berlin.DE> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Dirk Froemberg wrote: > > Hi Adam! > > On Mon, Apr 10, 2000 at 09:21:15PM +0100, Adam Laurie wrote: > > Dirk Froemberg wrote: > > > [...] > > > - a decision what to do with apache13-ssl. Adam, the maintainer, > > > wants to keep this port. But this wouldn't fit into the new concept. > > > So we either can have a exception or delete this port... > > > > What is "the new concept"? That mod_ssl replaces apache-ssl, or that one > > port conatains both mod_ssl and apache-ssl, user selectable? > > The new concept (or call it structure) is to have _one_ Apache port > (apache13) and several mod_* ports depending on apache13 instead > of having apache13-x, apache13-x-y, apache13-i-j, apache13-x-j, > etc... > > It has to be discussed what to do with apache13-ssl. One possibility > would be that mod_ssl replaces both apache13-modssl and apache13-ssl. > Another would be to make an exception and simply keep apache13-ssl. > And I'm sure there are others... Hmm. And what about the one where Apache-SSL replaces both apache13-modssl and apache13-ssl? Why do you consider Apache-SSL to need an exception, but not mod_ssl? I trust you are aware that both need Apache to be patched before they work? Cheers, Ben. -- http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message