From owner-freebsd-current Sun Feb 16 3: 7:30 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCB0437B401 for ; Sun, 16 Feb 2003 03:07:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from nagual.pp.ru (pobrecita.freebsd.ru [194.87.13.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B33F043FBD for ; Sun, 16 Feb 2003 03:07:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ache@pobrecita.freebsd.ru) Received: from pobrecita.freebsd.ru (ache@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nagual.pp.ru (8.12.7/8.12.7) with ESMTP id h1GB7PEJ099915; Sun, 16 Feb 2003 14:07:25 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from ache@pobrecita.freebsd.ru) Received: (from ache@localhost) by pobrecita.freebsd.ru (8.12.7/8.12.6/Submit) id h1GB7PvI099914; Sun, 16 Feb 2003 14:07:25 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from ache) Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 14:07:25 +0300 From: "Andrey A. Chernov" To: phk@phk.freebsd.dk Cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: OPIE breakage: backout & patch for review Message-ID: <20030216110725.GA99812@nagual.pp.ru> References: <20030216105605.GA99732@nagual.pp.ru> <5014.1045393137@critter.freebsd.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5014.1045393137@critter.freebsd.dk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 11:58:57 +0100, phk@phk.freebsd.dk wrote: > In message <20030216105605.GA99732@nagual.pp.ru>, "Andrey A. Chernov" writes: > >On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 13:27:38 +0300, Andrey A. Chernov wrote: > >> > >> Unless you specify exact details of what I ignore, I'll be forced to > >> treat your reply as NO REVIEW and commit this changes. > > > >Well, after numerous exchanges of nonsense messages [...] > > That is probably the most precise summary so far (NB: "exchanges" implies > that the non-sense goes both ways). Yes, but nonsense from my side is more detailed. :-) But... Nonsense from my side happens only because 1) I see the breakage. 2) Seen breakage, I try to guess what des means, when he made it, having no information from des. 3) If I guess it (with no information) incorrectly, it not means that breakage not exist, it still there. > Please take this to private email. I not see enough good will from des side for it. -- Andrey A. Chernov http://ache.pp.ru/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message