Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 11 Apr 1997 09:07:48 +0200
From:      phk@dk.tfs.com
To:        Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
Cc:        current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: WHY? ...non-use of TAILQ macros... 
Message-ID:  <1094.860742468@critter>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 10 Apr 1997 15:48:44 PDT." <199704102248.PAA10021@phaeton.artisoft.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <199704102248.PAA10021@phaeton.artisoft.com>, Terry Lambert writes:
>
>On the theory that the TAILQ_xxx macros were being avoided and the
>queue elemments themselves directly refernce for No Good Reason(tm),
>I just compiled the following:

You're way behind Terry!  :-)

I argued this long time ago and started to introduce the _FIRST, _LAST,
_NEXT, _PREV and _EMPTY macros as I have got to it.

A patch for this from you would be most welcome of course.

--
Poul-Henning Kamp           | phk@FreeBSD.ORG       FreeBSD Core-team.
http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk    Private mailbox.
whois: [PHK]                | phk@tfs.com           TRW Financial Systems, Inc.
Power and ignorance is a disgusting cocktail.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1094.860742468>