From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 28 14:17:44 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7280A16A420 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 14:17:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from parv@pair.com) Received: from mta10.adelphia.net (mta10.adelphia.net [68.168.78.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0626B43D45 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 14:17:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from parv@pair.com) Received: from default.chvlva.adelphia.net ([69.160.66.115]) by mta10.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20060228141743.WOWG8442.mta10.adelphia.net@default.chvlva.adelphia.net>; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 09:17:43 -0500 Received: by default.chvlva.adelphia.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DC375B781; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 09:17:41 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 09:17:41 -0500 From: Parv To: Ion-Mihai Tetcu Message-ID: <20060228141741.GB33788@holestein.holy.cow> Mail-Followup-To: Ion-Mihai Tetcu , Jeremy Chadwick , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <867j7gd8kw.fsf@PECTOPAH.shenton.org> <20060228083210.GI13185@goofy.cultdeadsheep.org> <20060228103912.GA166@pentarou.parodius.com> <20060228154636.3e114177@it.buh.tecnik93.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060228154636.3e114177@it.buh.tecnik93.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Jeremy Chadwick Subject: Re: Which ports store/use OPTIONS (/var/db/ports/portname/options)? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 14:17:44 -0000 in message <20060228154636.3e114177@it.buh.tecnik93.com>, wrote Ion-Mihai Tetcu thusly... > > On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 02:39:12 -0800 Jeremy Chadwick > wrote: ... > > Personally, I've never liked OPTIONS ... > > especially if the port author changes some of the OPTIONS names > > between port revisions ... > Indeed when OPTIONS change, either in meaning or in number > (OPTIONS added/removed) currently there's no warning for the user. > I have implemented something in two of my ports for this and I > will submit a patch for bsd.port.mk shortly. Ion-Mihai, i thank you for your effort for the above mentioned patch. (Hurry up! :) - Parv --