From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Dec 28 21:47:42 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91D5BE82AD3 for ; Thu, 28 Dec 2017 21:47:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@rancor.immure.com) Received: from rancor.immure.com (108-84-10-9.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net [108.84.10.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "darth.immure.com", Issuer "darth.immure.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 464ED6DCC5 for ; Thu, 28 Dec 2017 21:47:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@rancor.immure.com) Received: from rancor.immure.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rancor.immure.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id vBSLlehp048101 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 28 Dec 2017 15:47:40 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from bob@rancor.immure.com) Received: (from bob@localhost) by rancor.immure.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id vBSLldn1048100; Thu, 28 Dec 2017 15:47:39 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from bob) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2017 15:47:39 -0600 From: Bob Willcox To: Eugene Grosbein Cc: ports list Subject: Re: 6100 subdirectories in /usr/ports/devel! Message-ID: <20171228214739.GM99670@rancor.immure.com> Reply-To: Bob Willcox References: <20171228203634.GK99670@rancor.immure.com> <5A4557E8.70907@grosbein.net> <5A455A04.4090100@grosbein.net> <20171228211639.GL99670@rancor.immure.com> <5A45620B.6080801@grosbein.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5A45620B.6080801@grosbein.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.3 (2017-05-23) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2017 21:47:42 -0000 On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 04:28:43AM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > 29.12.2017 4:16, Bob Willcox wrote: > > >> In fact, ports/devel is first but not only category having similar problem with p5-* stuff: > >> > >> $ cd /usr/ports > >> $ find . -type d -mindepth 1 -maxdepth 1 | while read category; do printf "%15s " ${category#./}; ls $category | sed 's/-.*//' | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn | head -1; done | sort -k 2,2 -rn | head -15 > >> devel 1908 p5 > >> www 807 p5 > >> textproc 617 p5 > >> net 327 p5 > >> databases 259 p5 > >> security 258 p5 > >> math 146 p5 > >> mail 145 p5 > >> graphics 100 p5 > >> editors 98 libreoffice > >> sysutils 75 rubygem > >> converters 72 p5 > >> misc 63 p5 > >> net-mgmt 56 p5 > >> x11-toolkits 49 p5 > >> > > > > Yeah, I happened to notice the py-* stuff due to some problems I have been > > having with synth. I did notice the large number of p5-* subdirs but didn't > > count them. :) > > > > Certainly seems to be out of control... > > I like we have all this p5-* stuff in the Ports. > It seems that 1900+ devel/p5-* ports justify new p5-devel or devel-p5 category, though. > > But wouldn't such large move become a nightmare for users updating their systems? Yeah, I don't mind them being in there (have to admit that I haven't ever been a perl fan, not since Larry Wall's first version in the '80s), and agree with you that we should give them their own directory (or directories). I think the py-* entries could stand the same treatment. -- Bob Willcox | If everything is coming your way, you're in the bob@immure.com | wrong lane. Austin, TX |