Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 14 Aug 2021 01:04:30 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        standards@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 257827] Providing _POSIX_C_SOURCE causes some C++ headers to fail
Message-ID:  <bug-257827-99-KLMyYqFaJI@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-257827-99@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-257827-99@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D257827

Warner Losh <imp@FreeBSD.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |imp@FreeBSD.org

--- Comment #1 from Warner Losh <imp@FreeBSD.org> ---
_POSIX_C_SOURCE=3D200112 is only valid for 'C' code, not 'C++'.
It specifically requires a C99 compiler as well, and only makes c99
defined functions visible (and a few others that aren't relevant here).
isascii is marked as XSI in the POSIX standard and ctypes.h says that it mu=
st
define the proper feature test macros (in this case _XOPEN_SOURCE must be
defined to 700) before it is visible.

So I'm thinking this isn't a bug in two different ways: it's not C and even=
 if
it were, the proper _XOPEN_SOURCE macro isn't defined when you've asked for
strict POSIX compliance.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-257827-99-KLMyYqFaJI>