From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 30 08:02:10 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FA0D1065676 for ; Wed, 30 May 2012 08:02:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from natbsd@instinctive.eu) Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com (mail-wi0-f172.google.com [209.85.212.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22BED8FC0A for ; Wed, 30 May 2012 08:02:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wibhj8 with SMTP id hj8so2835921wib.13 for ; Wed, 30 May 2012 01:02:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:user-agent:x-gm-message-state; bh=Bqmvnd3+zi4EAMx/hhMfoXT67FQPP/2lxyvwCxZtgOg=; b=TanuvX6BSaaeK+EXqBxK5+gO4JtsosmN6+BvNcVndhRjQS5r3juNLc7HDVNGiOpbZp J47s+Ffmlyj6mGS1bwZa0JKYOOAOfO51FAA2QfcFcDYbg1yn+gm3swyauJWalS9Twn5J 0I8sMUXSAmK2hTBkF+FOLkSpPyRr5rh6IaQ4YmYddNqQwh0X8FvVw9AReBlmOWoH6f3D XLrFCiBXD4VfzXqoQZVazvwaiJB1aIE0YY3UMKhoWKiXpIB6PkYaT4XNONHh/ULLAXV+ 6ZgF8aRoi06D0lum+XFFER4QCLResom3xTbIto9Zit0uiFrgZvtlS62a+oHBFS9kQOOD 3zbw== Received: by 10.216.212.217 with SMTP id y67mr10160385weo.173.1338364928295; Wed, 30 May 2012 01:02:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sigil.instinctive.eu (sigil.instinctive.eu. [78.41.233.119]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m20sm24786525wie.6.2012.05.30.01.02.04 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 30 May 2012 01:02:06 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 10:01:48 +0200 From: Natacha =?iso-8859-1?Q?Port=E9?= To: Kevin Oberman Message-ID: <20120530080148.GJ97037@sigil.instinctive.eu> References: <20120523151357.GC97037@sigil.instinctive.eu> <20120529093812.GH97037@sigil.instinctive.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkgp0CbIJGZbNCu0udOB0dBK6Ipw9Y7O6QK3Q18/xAo9fMtiE7nIe2Lp2259Ug0cBpEq5De Cc: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How can I help with thinkpad x220 issues? X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 08:02:10 -0000 Hello, on Tuesday 29 May 2012 at 18:18, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > Do you see the same behavior? Would you have any idea on how to diagnose > > whatever could be wrong? > > Have you applied the kernel patches? Yes, I think so, that's what I meant when I wrote: > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 2:38 AM, Natacha Porté wrote: > > More specifically, I checked out 9-STABLE, and merged all 14 commits > > listed at the end of http://wiki.freebsd.org/Intel_GPU More specifically, here is the sequence of commands I used, extracted from my shell history: mkdir STABLE cd STABLE svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/9 cd 9/sys svn merge -c 235356,235359,235362,235365,235366,235372,235375,235776,235782,235783,235846,235847,235859,235925 svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/head/sys cd .. vim sys/dev/acpi_support/acpi_ibm.c # adding "LEN0068" make buildworld buildkernel make installworld installkernel mergemaster -FUi shutdown -r now The list of revisions to merge is taken directly from http://wiki.freebsd.org/Intel_GPU where the patch used to be. There was only one reported merge conflict, caused by a line a context from CURRENT that didn't exist in STABLE, but since it was only adding declaration lines, it was trivially solved. Now maybe I'm missing some code, maybe I made a mistake copying the revision numbers (I've only checked them 3 times, but found no mismatch), maybe the wiki page is wrong. That's why I'm publicly asking for help, at least for diagnosis. Or maybe I made no mistake and intel integrated GPU is just that bad (though performance in Windows does not really hint that way). Thanks for your help, Natacha