From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 13 20:11:10 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D28C106566C for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 20:11:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45B2B8FC0C for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 20:11:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5DKB9rD011178; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 14:11:09 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q5DKB92W011175; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 14:11:09 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 14:11:09 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Sean Bruno In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <1338922510.10539.8.camel@powernoodle-l7.corp.yahoo.com> <1338930799.10539.12.camel@powernoodle-l7.corp.yahoo.com> <1339531057.42366.2.camel@powernoodle.corp.yahoo.com> <20120613.120600.2188772873180778735.hrs@allbsd.org> <1339610792.2878.5.camel@powernoodle.corp.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 13 Jun 2012 14:11:09 -0600 (MDT) Cc: "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: est man page X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 20:11:10 -0000 On Wed, 13 Jun 2012, Warren Block wrote: > On Wed, 13 Jun 2012, Sean Bruno wrote: > >> >>> se> http://people.freebsd.org/~sbruno/est_man.txt >>> >>> Looks good. Attached a diff for some small fixes. >> >> Updated again with feedback that I've gotten. >> >> I changed the "Note that est interface is automatically loaded" to "Note >> that est capabilities are automatically loaded" > > The only remaining problem I see is > > .Sh COMPATIBILITY > .Nm > is only found on supported Intel CPUs. > > est(4) is not on the supported CPUs, but EST, the feature that est(4) uses. > > Does "supported" mean "supported by est(4)" or "supported by the CPU"? > > Maybe > > Enhanced Speedstep Technology is supported by many Intel CPUs. Oops, and trailing whitespace on lines 66 and 70.