Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 10:15:50 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Dan Pelleg <daniel+bsd@pelleg.org> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: what does this message mean ? Message-ID: <20031117181550.GB32124@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <u2s1xs7kqwq.fsf@gs166.sp.cs.cmu.edu> References: <200311170230.30400.petre@kgb.ro> <20031117021221.GA21013@xor.obsecurity.org> <u2s1xs7kqwq.fsf@gs166.sp.cs.cmu.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--17pEHd4RhPHOinZp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 09:31:33AM -0500, Dan Pelleg wrote: > Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> writes: >=20 > > On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 02:30:30AM +0200, Petre Bandac wrote: > > > Nov 17 02:27:59 kgb /kernel: OUCH! cannot remove rule, count 1 > > >=20 > > > why ouch and what rule ? > >=20 > > I think that's an ipfw message..it's probably an ipfw bug of some > > kind. >=20 > It is. But a few of those were corrected in the past. Make sure you're > running an up-to-date version (eg 4.9-RELEASE; iirc even 4.8 should be ok= ). I've got these when playing with dummynet on 4.8-STABLE..I don't remember any related commits after that time. Also, the 'bw tun0' syntax specified in the manpage seems to be broken - it wedged the tun0 interface and the machine had to be rebooted. Can anyone else confirm whether this works for them? Kris --17pEHd4RhPHOinZp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/uRBVWry0BWjoQKURAiEMAJ9vF9OsGua4EtkUbUcc+XXeti+W+ACgrLK0 AeQgFLs2hhSL6GXgPoyN+as= =DjLY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --17pEHd4RhPHOinZp--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031117181550.GB32124>