From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jan 15 00:42:51 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A52EF16A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 15 Jan 2004 00:42:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.des.no (flood.des.no [217.116.83.31])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 965C043D49
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 15 Jan 2004 00:42:48 -0800 (PST)	(envelope-from des@des.no)
Received: by smtp.des.no (Pony Express, from userid 666)
	id F3012530F; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 09:42:46 +0100 (CET)
Received: from dwp.des.no (des.no [80.203.228.37])
	by smtp.des.no (Pony Express) with ESMTP
	id 00251530D; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 09:42:38 +0100 (CET)
Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 2602)
	id D93C333C9A; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 09:42:38 +0100 (CET)
To: John Kennedy <jk@jk.homeunix.net>
References: <E1AgoC5-000Jwa-O6@dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk>
	<20040114172740.GA24901@memnoch.jk.homeunix.net>
From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=)
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 09:42:38 +0100
In-Reply-To: <20040114172740.GA24901@memnoch.jk.homeunix.net> (John
 Kennedy's message of "Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:27:40 -0800")
Message-ID: <xzpisjdmwld.fsf@dwp.des.no>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090024 (Oort Gnus v0.24) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on 
	flood.des.no
X-Spam-Level: ss
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK,
	RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.61
cc: Pete French <petefrench@keithprowse.com>
cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ANy difference between 5.X ports tree and 4.X ports tree ?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 08:42:51 -0000

John Kennedy <jk@jk.homeunix.net> writes:
>   There are *lots* of differences between 4.x, 5.x and current given some
> distance in time separating them, but you're right that the ports are more
> or less the same.

there is no "more or less".  there is only one ports tree, and a
freshly updated ports tree on a 4.9 box is exactly the same as a
freshly updated ports tree on a 5.2 box.

DES
--=20
Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no