From owner-freebsd-security Mon Oct 26 22:47:37 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id WAA17868 for freebsd-security-outgoing; Mon, 26 Oct 1998 22:47:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from ns.itep.ru (ns.itep.ru [193.124.224.35]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA17863 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 1998 22:47:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Fedor.Gubarev@itep.ru) Received: from raven.itep.ru (raven.itep.ru [193.124.227.26]) by ns.itep.ru (8.8.5-MVC-ITEP-100697/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA15573 for ; Tue, 27 Oct 1998 10:47:16 +0300 (GMT+0300) Received: from localhost (gubarev@localhost) by raven.itep.ru (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id JAA03652 for ; Tue, 27 Oct 1998 09:46:18 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from Fedor.Gubarev@itep.ru) X-Authentication-Warning: raven.itep.ru: gubarev owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 27 Oct 1998 09:46:18 +0300 (MSK) From: Fedor Gubarev X-Sender: gubarev@raven.itep.ru Reply-To: Fedor Gubarev To: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: nestea v2 against freebsd 3.0-Release In-Reply-To: <4.1.19981023093637.00af1df0@adm.ujf-grenoble.fr> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I wonder why there is no response at all on this mail. It seems a little bit surprising at least..... On Fri, 23 Oct 1998, Gilles Bruno wrote: > Hi everyone, > we tested yesterday the old nestea v2 against a brand new > 3.0-Release : it has prooved to be effective against it > (the box rebooted - invalid page fault while in kernel > mode). The same test against 2.2.[6,7]-Release didn't harm > at all. > > Am I missing something ? some sysctl ? a special kernel config ? > > Let us know... > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message