From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 19 01:15:42 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76A3B16A41F for ; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 01:15:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from aiolos.otenet.gr (aiolos.otenet.gr [195.170.0.93]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A96743D53 for ; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 01:15:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from flame.pc (patr530-a173.otenet.gr [212.205.215.173]) by aiolos.otenet.gr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-1) with ESMTP id j8J1FXlu018225; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 04:15:33 +0300 Received: from flame.pc (flame [127.0.0.1]) by flame.pc (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j8J1FIFJ008244; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 04:15:18 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by flame.pc (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j8J1FIbL008243; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 04:15:18 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 04:15:17 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Harlan Stenn Message-ID: <20050919011517.GA8214@flame.pc> References: <20050918132642.GA1048@flame.pc> <20050919004538.64E5A39ADB@ntp1.ntp.isc.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050919004538.64E5A39ADB@ntp1.ntp.isc.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gmake/make dependency problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 01:15:42 -0000 On 2005-09-19 00:45, Harlan Stenn wrote: > Here's what I am seeing: > > stenn@barnstable> gmake -n ntpd-opts.c > gmake: `../../ntpd/ntpd-opts.c' is up to date. > stenn@barnstable> make -n ntpd-opts.c > cd ../../ntpd && autogen ntpd-opts.def > stenn@barnstable> Hmmm, without seeing the makefile, it seems that some of the targets ends up depending on nothing at all, which re-builds it every time make runs. I'd have to see at least the makefiles to be sure though :-(