From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Jul 18 16:44:50 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EED8914D9F for ; Sun, 18 Jul 1999 16:44:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA38895; Sun, 18 Jul 1999 17:44:39 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id RAA75607; Sun, 18 Jul 1999 17:44:39 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <199907182344.RAA75607@harmony.village.org> To: Peter Jeremy Subject: Re: telnetd Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 19 Jul 1999 09:00:14 +1000." <99Jul19.084214est.40330@border.alcanet.com.au> References: <99Jul19.084214est.40330@border.alcanet.com.au> Date: Sun, 18 Jul 1999 17:44:39 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <99Jul19.084214est.40330@border.alcanet.com.au> Peter Jeremy writes: : There's nothing stopping you unifdefing telnetd on your system. I : have no opinion as to the merits (or otherwise) of leaving the : ifdef's in the main code tree. True, but since some of what I'm doing is making sure that there are no security implications to some of the paths, doing that would be useless, since that wouldn't be what is checked into the system. We really don't need the ifdefs for solaris, cray, etc, do we? Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message