From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 23 04:09:07 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4197816A4CE for ; Fri, 23 Jan 2004 04:09:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from phantom.cris.net (phantom.cris.net [212.110.130.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D5F543D2F for ; Fri, 23 Jan 2004 04:09:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ru@FreeBSD.org.ua) Received: from phantom.cris.net (ru@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by phantom.cris.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0NC9Wem036547; Fri, 23 Jan 2004 14:09:32 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from ru@FreeBSD.org.ua) Received: (from ru@localhost) by phantom.cris.net (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i0NC9WR1036542; Fri, 23 Jan 2004 14:09:32 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from ru) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 14:09:32 +0200 From: Ruslan Ermilov To: veedee@c7.campus.utcluj.ro Message-ID: <20040123120932.GD36171@FreeBSD.org.ua> References: <1074856183.401100f764173@isp.polynet.lviv.ua> <20040123114112.GA37273@c7.campus.utcluj.ro> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="uxuisgdDHaNETlh8" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040123114112.GA37273@c7.campus.utcluj.ro> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org cc: Andriy Korud Subject: Re: Which one ip_nat.h? X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 12:09:07 -0000 --uxuisgdDHaNETlh8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 01:41:12PM +0200, veedee@c7.campus.utcluj.ro wrote: > On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 01:09:43PM +0200, Andriy Korud wrote: > >=20 > > Hi, > > I need to define LARGE_NAT in ip_nat.h, however there are 3 such files = in my > > system: > > locate ip_nat.h > > /usr/include/netinet/ip_nat.h > > /usr/src/contrib/ipfilter/ip_nat.h > > /usr/src/sys/contrib/ipfilter/netinet/ip_nat.h > > > > The question is simple - which one should I change? >=20 > the last two. you need to recompile afterwards... >=20 For this same reason, I've removed a couple of duplicate IPFilter headers =66rom HEAD 2,5 years ago, including src/contrib/ipfilter/ip_nat.h: : revision 1.2 : date: 2001/06/18 15:54:04; author: ru; state: dead; lines: +0 -0 : Removed duplicate copies of files already present in sys/contrib/ipfilter. :=20 : Not objected to by: -arch No, I'm not volunteering to do the MFC. ;) Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov FreeBSD committer ru@FreeBSD.org --uxuisgdDHaNETlh8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAEQ78Ukv4P6juNwoRAlvQAJ9XrFvdaW7sPXNDvq8M/6JuXIV28QCfdb8w cbW0TLOSwuYNjt/GwJ//+VE= =3tEE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --uxuisgdDHaNETlh8--