From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Feb 10 11:13:10 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA22708 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 10 Feb 1998 11:13:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from dyson.iquest.net (dyson.iquest.net [198.70.144.127]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA22697 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 1998 11:12:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dyson@dyson.iquest.net) Received: (from root@localhost) by dyson.iquest.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA06216; Tue, 10 Feb 1998 14:12:44 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from dyson) Message-Id: <199802101912.OAA06216@dyson.iquest.net> Subject: Re: kirk's soft-update integration.. (a vendor speaks...) In-Reply-To: <7yd8gw5fiw.fsf_-_@base.juniper.net> from Paul Traina at "Feb 9, 98 07:01:59 pm" To: pst@juniper.net (Paul Traina) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 1998 14:12:44 -0500 (EST) Cc: marcs@znep.com, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG From: "John S. Dyson" Reply-To: dyson@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL32 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Paul Traina said: > For what it's worth, we would have no objection to Kirk's hooks and stubs > going into FreeBSD, nor would we have any objection to other similar projects > as long as the non-poison'ed version of the OS does not suffer. > > Suffer includes, but is not limited to, performance degredation and bit-rot. > The only think that Kirk's code forces is some bugfixing in our tree. Without his stuff, there is no negative effect. I happen to work at a place where we have the same concerns, and there is nothing but good happening, for both adopters and non-adopters. -- John | Never try to teach a pig to sing, dyson@freebsd.org | it just makes you look stupid, jdyson@nc.com | and it irritates the pig. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe hackers" in the body of the message