From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Oct 22 11:31:15 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DACFC1C8FE for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2016 11:31:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@skysmurf.nl) Received: from mail.skysmurf.nl (spectrum.skysmurf.nl [83.162.175.214]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.skysmurf.nl", Issuer "mail.skysmurf.nl" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0545304 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2016 11:31:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@skysmurf.nl) Received: from spectrum.skysmurf.nl (mail.skysmurf.nl [192.168.42.4]) by mail.skysmurf.nl (8.15.2/8.15.2) with SMTP id u9MBV4U0037984; Sat, 22 Oct 2016 13:31:04 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@skysmurf.nl) Received: by spectrum.skysmurf.nl (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 22 Oct 2016 13:31:04 +0200 Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2016 13:31:04 +0200 From: Alphons van Werven To: andrew clarke Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: misc/jive deleted Message-ID: <20161022113104.GA9380@spectrum.skysmurf.nl> References: <20161022024510.7cvnhc2fdh7h7arh@ozzmosis.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="EeQfGwPcQSOJBaQU" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161022024510.7cvnhc2fdh7h7arh@ozzmosis.com> X-PGP-Key: http://www.skysmurf.nl/~fonz/fonz_pubkey.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2016 11:31:15 -0000 --EeQfGwPcQSOJBaQU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable andrew clarke wrote: > Is this the first time a port has been deleted for being "offensive"? There used to be "offensive" (a term to be taken rather loosely in this case) fortune cookies, but they got kicked out somewhere in 9.X. That was the base system though; not the ports tree. Come to think of it, I'm quite (be it pleasantly) surprised to see that deskutils/hot-babe is still allowed. I'm still half waiting for someone with misguided delusions of moral superiority to delete that port, thinking it's their decision to make that FreeBSD must not enable people to display their system load as a cartoon woman in various stages of undress. Or something along those lines. But I digress... Anyway, if anyone misses this port, I'll be happy to maintain it privately and make it available from a public repository, if only because I strongly oppose censorship, so I would gladly help circumvent what I consider to be a hopelessly outdated and even morally wrong concept. Fonz Disclaimer: I am neither the author nor the maintainer of misc/jive. Ditto for deskutils/hot-babe. --=20 A.J. "Fonz" van Werven mailsig: Help! I'm a prisoner in a Chinese fortune cookie factory. --EeQfGwPcQSOJBaQU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJYC034AAoJEAfP7gJTaCe8ld0QAN9nfV7tigSvz+//fsL1a6v1 aG+KsAPh5mb4h5/yTVLY8xWWAzTSQSkXO7+rzeRSIW1eUkKt059ymBGuiE5ruSux Jxp7sk78vc7ovOPENVeLGBkXtAx15BhLIBGiktYgkR2WyX50pX+x15vXe/Pd37XO fWXCyN9EsxPzSJcRifEbi7QebSdDfjD5vutsFGsnzz9H0GzFijVHJeyroaCm2xp3 hQXtuVnLv9MjJBdUH9B1OUIGOEYZHgUC+yrAQMdxNqY/RH0o+406uAklcEDBylgM cTnWSBP7X2gTuDBSNGveV156Txvh9hNH+nmwAoXWRhDxcNnwIITNBpyTyaFV+NNM nXnqU8SYtbcKeiY7xv54I7AyCxPZu3VQJ8jaOCPW1WdnQurhMFQbzNqJfHPB3SmE wwhuu2gZcrpFLdpRV2uVRN4uBFfCb26pm3eGtb/tllry6iIt01SFbb8e0V9P5Bdo j3qkvuk2Gt3CBiD+jys41+DCd3eKkGyXUYvQMl8xTiRg/6hUjX/Qnsh+q2YLjknk 9KXhwPXcbjjxK7As8TtPJbsUVx/1NPIvYiwYL+VEfQfmm5OUXwsuOEnyHuqN4lGn tBIPc4JlaAEV8aEG6TiPqPUlFsRQ7yKB2whSKN6goXtjrzxWvlfLhmUs7/+m9Rsp q7VmM/j3ZdNYBfQ3oBV6 =KDGf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --EeQfGwPcQSOJBaQU--