From owner-freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Feb 22 05:14:03 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-rc@hub.freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-rc@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0675C16A422;
	Wed, 22 Feb 2006 05:14:03 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from brooks@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9598543D48;
	Wed, 22 Feb 2006 05:14:02 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from brooks@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (brooks@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1M5E2UH075684;
	Wed, 22 Feb 2006 05:14:02 GMT
	(envelope-from brooks@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from brooks@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k1M5E1EB075680;
	Wed, 22 Feb 2006 05:14:01 GMT (envelope-from brooks)
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 05:14:01 GMT
From: Brooks Davis <brooks@FreeBSD.org>
Message-Id: <200602220514.k1M5E1EB075680@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: josemi@freebsd.jazztel.es, brooks@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org
Cc: 
Subject: Re: conf/74005: [PATCH] aditional support for /etc/rc.initdiskless
X-BeenThere: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion related to /etc/rc.d design and implementation."
	<freebsd-rc.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-rc>,
	<mailto:freebsd-rc-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-rc>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-rc@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-rc-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-rc>,
	<mailto:freebsd-rc-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 05:14:03 -0000

Synopsis: [PATCH] aditional support for /etc/rc.initdiskless

State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
State-Changed-By: brooks
State-Changed-When: Wed Feb 22 05:07:06 UTC 2006
State-Changed-Why: 
Given that we've replaced cpio with tar in HEAD and RELENG_6 I'm not
convinced the added complexity it worth it here. Moving the tar call
into a function to make it easy to edit would make some sense, but I
don't feel a great desire to support non-default installs out of the box
here given the cost involved.  Note that with tar being used, virtually
any archive will work as the cpio.gz.

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=74005