From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 5 06:25:52 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBE3B16A4CF for ; Thu, 5 Feb 2004 06:25:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from transport.cksoft.de (transport.cksoft.de [62.111.66.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2534843D46 for ; Thu, 5 Feb 2004 06:25:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from transport.cksoft.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by transport.cksoft.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C2191FF905; Thu, 5 Feb 2004 15:25:50 +0100 (CET) Received: by transport.cksoft.de (Postfix, from userid 66) id 6E9BE1FF903; Thu, 5 Feb 2004 15:25:48 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail.int.zabbadoz.net (Postfix, from userid 1060) id C6FBB154F6; Thu, 5 Feb 2004 14:24:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.int.zabbadoz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC50A154D8; Thu, 5 Feb 2004 14:24:42 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 14:24:42 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" X-X-Sender: bz@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net To: cjclark@alum.mit.edu In-Reply-To: <20040204212147.GA32947@blossom.cjclark.org> Message-ID: References: <1074650025.701.82.camel@itouch-1011.prv.au.itouchnet.net> <20040203070435.GB46486@blossom.cjclark.org> <1075893572.29017.1.camel@oblivion> <20040204212147.GA32947@blossom.cjclark.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS cksoft-s20020300-20031204bz on transport.cksoft.de cc: Andrew Thomson cc: FreeBSD current mailing list Subject: Re: ipsec changes in 5.2R X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2004 14:25:53 -0000 On Wed, 4 Feb 2004, Crist J. Clark wrote: > It would be really, really nice to get this bug out of KAME IPsec > before 5.2.1, but if 5.2 didn't wait... the KAME people are currently busy working on other things and cannot reproduce problems on NetBSD; thus there is at least one discussion on a fix open but one of the two proposed has been committed to HEAD for 5.2.1 (before branching I think). apart from that have you read my other mail ? Can you please try 5.2.1-RC or better HEAD and tell me the results; HEAD has an extra commit from ume that might help with this particular issue. -- Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT 56 69 73 69 74 http://www.zabbadoz.net/