From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 9 09:27:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3798106564A for ; Fri, 9 Jul 2010 09:27:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from kuber.nabble.com (kuber.nabble.com [216.139.236.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B8228FC1B for ; Fri, 9 Jul 2010 09:27:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1OX9rh-00007H-Os for freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Fri, 09 Jul 2010 02:27:25 -0700 Message-ID: <29115839.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 02:27:25 -0700 (PDT) From: "Nikol@y" To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: cosmic17@gmail.com References: <4C3631F4.4090504@gmail.com> <20100708215554.GH9303@michelle.cdnetworks.com> Subject: Re: page fault in igb on 8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2010 09:27:26 -0000 I have the same problems like in http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2009-November/013222.html and you are discussing. Unfortunately, I have no test machine yet. But I think in short time I can send you backtrace. The problem with Intel Gigabit ET Quad Port Server Adapter (Ethernet controller Intel 82257). I have created the theme http://old.nabble.com/tuning-igb-82257-in-FreeBSD-8.0-td29083109.html Nicolas Chris Buechler wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 1:03 AM, Jack Vogel wrote: >> Damn, thats bad, and this is with what installed exactly, RC1, 2? I'll >> have >> someone in validation install to see if we can repro this tomorrow, let >> me >> know what it is asap. >> > > This is RELENG_8_1 as of date=2010.06.25.00.00.00 It's pfSense 2.0, > technically, but equivalent to RELENG_8_1 as of that date. We use a > fixed date to prevent snapshot breakage with one of our kernel patches > failing to apply (none for any drivers, nor any that impact drivers in > our experience). We'll be bumping that again in the near future. > > All the info I have at the moment is this picture: > http://cvs.pfsense.org/~cmb/20100708211.jpg > > Will be getting a backtrace in the morning. > > thanks! > > Chris > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/page-fault-in-igb-on-8.1-tp29111546p29115839.html Sent from the freebsd-net mailing list archive at Nabble.com.