From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Jun 23 5:28:30 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mail.eecs.harvard.edu (bowser.eecs.harvard.edu [140.247.60.24]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4755A37B403 for ; Sun, 23 Jun 2002 05:28:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail.eecs.harvard.edu (Postfix, from userid 465) id 22D3554C831; Sun, 23 Jun 2002 08:28:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.eecs.harvard.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20B3854C64A for ; Sun, 23 Jun 2002 08:28:19 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2002 08:28:19 -0400 (EDT) From: Dan Ellard To: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: again: FreeBSD NFS server benchmarks vs. OpenBSD, NetBSD? Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG There have been some useful responses to my original question, but I guess I didn't make it clear enough what the question was, because I got a lot of responses comparing the NFS servers on systems other than FreeBSD, NetBSD, and OpenBSD. I'm only interested in comparing the performance of these three systems (at least for the short run). If you've got a comparison of these three systems, or if someone has these systems running in-house and would be willing to benchmark them, I'd love to see the results! Thanks, -Dan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message