From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Mar 16 16:44:57 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from cs.rpi.edu (mumble.cs.rpi.edu [128.213.8.16]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A42C1518D for ; Tue, 16 Mar 1999 16:44:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from crossd@cs.rpi.edu) Received: from cs.rpi.edu (crossd@ken.cs.rpi.edu [128.213.4.10]) by cs.rpi.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id TAA16397; Tue, 16 Mar 1999 19:44:32 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <199903170044.TAA16397@cs.rpi.edu> To: Matthew Dillon Cc: "David E. Cross" , freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, crossd@cs.rpi.edu Subject: Re: KVA size changes in 3.1-stable In-Reply-To: Message from Matthew Dillon of "Tue, 16 Mar 1999 16:10:53 PST." <199903170010.QAA20187@apollo.backplane.com> Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 19:44:31 -0500 From: "David E. Cross" Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG We have pretty much ruled out everything else. No 2 of the crashes are ever the same, it is only this machine, and the only difference between this machine and other machines that are rock solid (48+ days uptime), is that this machine has the high maxusers. It is required that this machine has a high maxusers as it is used for shell access for students writing programs. Are there any problems with incorperating Tor's changes into 3.1-STABLE? If so please speak, as that is exactly what I am doing now. -- David Cross To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message