From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 4 20:22:57 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1FB9106564A for ; Wed, 4 Jan 2012 20:22:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@sunsaturn.com) Received: from sunsaturn.com (mail1.sunsaturn.com [IPv6:2001:49f0:4004::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E2978FC12 for ; Wed, 4 Jan 2012 20:22:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by sunsaturn.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id DA278119C79; Wed, 4 Jan 2012 14:22:56 -0600 (CST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=sunsaturn.com; s=gamma; t=1325708576; bh=awMeN3QRXmsKm6PHHf1kCliVjTNu1KujWYnW9YgisDc=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=kzHyEfDVIWSlafB5B/nNLgGo3+JPFkiZ0T6hMwrOhnfyGUrGq7+fQlHMU8ovO2IX0 eVScJsUAxiNjeLX5EiJYbDI5E3bdUhPKb4HtUzBpM/hXzh+0XjrQj2QhVAOj1FWM6X U7ono+Tto4hP01ieDdpwZ8O4Bg32lxElPxOCwTy0= Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sunsaturn.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D98A0119C6F for ; Wed, 4 Jan 2012 14:22:56 -0600 (CST) Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 14:22:56 -0600 (CST) From: Dan The Man To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII Subject: sysctl kern.ipc.somaxconn limit 65535 why? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2012 20:22:57 -0000 sunsaturn:~# sysctl -w kern.ipc.somaxconn=200000 kern.ipc.somaxconn: 4096 sysctl: kern.ipc.somaxconn: Invalid argument sunsaturn:~# sysctl -w kern.ipc.somaxconn=65536 kern.ipc.somaxconn: 4096 sysctl: kern.ipc.somaxconn: Invalid argument sunsaturn:~# sysctl -w kern.ipc.somaxconn=65535 kern.ipc.somaxconn: 4096 -> 65535 sunsaturn:~# Trying to stress test a framework here that tosses 100k of connections into a listen queue before doing anything, I realize I'll have to use multiple local IPs get get around port limitations, but why is this backlog using a limit? Dan. -- Dan The Man CTO/ Senior System Administrator Websites, Domains and Everything else http://www.SunSaturn.com Email: Dan@SunSaturn.com