From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 20 20:39:00 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1CE016A474; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 20:39:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from b.candler@pobox.com) Received: from proof.pobox.com (proof.pobox.com [207.106.133.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7020443D72; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 20:39:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from b.candler@pobox.com) Received: from proof (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by proof.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8894E28CAD; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 16:38:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mappit.local.linnet.org (212-74-113-67.static.dsl.as9105.com [212.74.113.67]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by proof.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5391E59B66; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 16:38:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from brian by mappit.local.linnet.org with local (Exim 4.61 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Fsmzw-0001l1-Rt; Tue, 20 Jun 2006 21:38:57 +0100 Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 21:38:56 +0100 From: Brian Candler To: obrien@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060620203856.GA6745@uk.tiscali.com> References: <20060620034229.GA48515@dragon.NUXI.org> <20060620141953.GB5731@uk.tiscali.com> <20060620202525.GA45624@dragon.NUXI.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060620202525.GA45624@dragon.NUXI.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: Subject: Re: Often experiencing nfs server foo:/bar: not responding X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 20:39:00 -0000 On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 01:25:25PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > > # ping -c100 -s1472 your.nfs.server > > > > Run this when the machine is idle; and run it while you are exercising > > the NFS server. Do you see any packet loss? > > When experiencing "kernel: nfs server server:/files: not responding", I > ran this suggest ping. The results were: > > --- 192.168.1.1 ping statistics --- > 100 packets transmitted, 100 packets received, 0% packet loss > round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.389/0.511/0.767/0.062 ms OK, thanks. That's a rough and ready test for duplex mismatches and general network flakiness, so I'd say it's more likely you have an NFS issue. Regards, Brian.