From owner-freebsd-current  Fri May 17 13:05:51 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id NAA14341
          for current-outgoing; Fri, 17 May 1996 13:05:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id NAA14331
          for <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 17 May 1996 13:05:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rover.village.org (8.7.5/8.6.6) with SMTP id OAA10324; Fri, 17 May 1996 14:04:13 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <199605172004.OAA10324@rover.village.org>
To: scott@statsci.com
Subject: Re: Is this is a stupid patch? 
Cc: invalid opcode <coredump@nervosa.com>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
In-reply-to: Your message of Fri, 17 May 1996 09:36:18 PDT
Date: Fri, 17 May 1996 14:04:13 -0600
From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

: 2) ftp anonymous@ftp.freebsd.org

I think -a arg would be better for anonymous ftp, but I like the user@
notation for ftp for real users.  The -a arg is much short than
anonymous@ or ftp@

Warner